Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 vs Whisper large-v3-turbo

Updated October 16, 2026. We do not rank this pair: at least one has no public score. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.

Share or export
Share on XLinkedInAPI/MCP

Decision reading

The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead. 0 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Model A

Reflection AI

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Model B
OpenAI logo

OpenAI

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Shared results
0
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 only
19
Whisper large-v3-turbo only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 / 8

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.

Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.

Show secondary and unsupported calls
  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Not enough matched evidence

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 and Whisper large-v3-turbo are not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

    Confidence: limited
  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 and Whisper large-v3-turbo are not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.

    Confidence: limited
  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete context comparison is not sourced.

    Confidence: limited
  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates
  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates
  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

Which one for a specific job

Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.

The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.

—Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4—Whisper large-v3-turbo

Not comparable · BenchAlign v5.8

The coding row is not comparable on the public lane: at least one model is not measured or not ranked there.

Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.

Same basis rules as the category table below

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

A shared-evidence shape is not available.

BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Agentic

Not comparable
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
Not ranked
Whisper large-v3-turbo
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 6 vs 0 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Coding

Not comparable
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
Not ranked
Whisper large-v3-turbo
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 7 vs 0 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Reasoning

Not comparable
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
85.5
Unranked · 3 rankable rows
Whisper large-v3-turbo
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
Not ranked
Whisper large-v3-turbo
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Knowledge

Not comparable
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
Not ranked
Whisper large-v3-turbo
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 2 vs 0 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
Not ranked
Whisper large-v3-turbo
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
86.2
#44/148
Whisper large-v3-turbo
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
87.9
Unranked · 1 rankable row
Whisper large-v3-turbo
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Bars run 0–100Methodology

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Whisper large-v3-turbo
API rate not published
Fit state unavailable

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Whisper large-v3-turbo has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Whisper large-v3-turbo
API rate not published
Fit state unavailable

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Whisper large-v3-turbo has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
Whisper large-v3-turbo
API rate not published
Fit state unavailable
Cached-input rate unavailable

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Whisper large-v3-turbo has no comparable published API token rate.

Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

API model ID

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4

Not sourced

Whisper large-v3-turbo

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4

Reasoning

Whisper large-v3-turbo

Non-Reasoning

Weight access

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4

Open Weight

Whisper large-v3-turbo

Open Weight

License

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4

Open Weight

Whisper large-v3-turbo

Open Weight

Release date

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4

2026-10-16

Whisper large-v3-turbo

2024-10-01

If you already use one of these models

Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
A complete documented context comparison is not available.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Questions

Which is better, Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 or Whisper large-v3-turbo?

The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 or Whisper large-v3-turbo?

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 and Whisper large-v3-turbo are not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 or Whisper large-v3-turbo?

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 and Whisper large-v3-turbo are not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.

Which costs less, Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 or Whisper large-v3-turbo?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 or Whisper large-v3-turbo?

A complete documented context-window comparison is not available.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence19 rows

Agentic

  • τ³-bench results

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP435.4%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • HLE w/ tools

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP451.1%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP478.4%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • MCP Atlas

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP480.5%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • BrowseComp

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP475.6%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • DeepSearchQA

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP481.1%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • DeepSWE

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP442.7%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench Pro

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP465.6%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP478.4%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP431.4%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE Multilingual

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP477.5%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench Verified

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP480.7%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • SciCode

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP446.9%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

Reasoning

  • CritPt

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP415.4%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • LongBench v2

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP467.2%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • GPQA-D

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP489.3%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

  • HLE w/o tools

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP434.8%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFBench

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP479.2%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • AIME26

    Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP497.5%
    Source
    Whisper large-v3-turbo—

    Not directly comparable

19 public results · 0 shared

Watch Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 vs Whisper large-v3-turbo

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Last updated October 16, 2026