Skip to main content
Radar

Every change to the models you run, with its source and its date. Releases, price changes, retirements, API changes, and incidents.Every change to the models you run, with its source.

Follow model changes
CurrentReleased Sep 17, 2026ProprietaryReasoningN/A context

Pareto 26.9

Decision reading
Pareto 26.9 is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 4 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.

Released Sep 17, 2026 see all recent releases

Data as of September 18, 2026 · How the score is built

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

4 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

Unranked

field median 56.3

Not eligible for a public rank

Price

$2.50input / $7.50 output

input median $0.95

cached $0.25 · blended $5

Speed

Not measured

field median 90 tok/s

Time to first token not measured

Context

N/A

field median 256,000

Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. Agentic1/1 verified
  2. Coding1/1 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. Knowledge1/1 verified
  5. MathNot measured
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Multimodal1/1 verified
  8. Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerifiedScore pending
CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerifiedScore pending
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkVerified77.4
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkVerified60.9
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding1 row
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
DeepSWEScore74.0%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Muse Spark 1.3 · 75.4%

Gap1.4 behindWeightDisplay only
Agentic1 row
Agentic benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
Terminal-Bench 4.0Score51.00%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Mythos 5.1 · 60.90%

Gap9.9 behindWeightDisplay only
Knowledge1 row
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
HLE w/o toolsHumanity's Last Exam without toolsScore49%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Fable 5.1 · 60.9%

Gap11.9 behindWeightDisplay only
Multimodal1 row
Multimodal benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
MMMU-ProMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding ProScore78%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Gemini 3.5 Flash · 83.6%

Gap5.6 behindWeightDisplay only

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
paretoUnbiased pricing
Context window
N/A
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Sold only as the `pareto` model string on Unbiased's OpenAI-compatible API at https://api.unbiased.ai/v1, which also accepts Anthropic /v1/messages traffic. Access is prepaid pay-as-you-go credits and the service is in beta with every signup reviewed by hand; GET /v1/models is not implemented. Text and image input, text output. Unbiased publishes no context-window figure and no weights.
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Current
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Published at $0.25 per million cached input tokensUnbiased pricing
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Sep 17, 2026 · you are here

    Pareto 26.9

    Not publicly ranked · $2.5 / $7.5

Base entry

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

We track Pareto 26.9, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.

Pareto 26.9 is a proprietary model with a N/A context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

Sold only as the `pareto` model string on Unbiased's OpenAI-compatible API at https://api.unbiased.ai/v1, which also accepts Anthropic /v1/messages traffic. Access is prepaid pay-as-you-go credits and the service is in beta with every signup reviewed by hand; GET /v1/models is not implemented. Text and image input, text output. Unbiased publishes no context-window figure and no weights.

Pareto is not a single model. Unbiased describes it as a blend that engages multiple LLMs in parallel on every request and synthesizes one answer, drawing on both frontier and open models, and states that the composition can change between releases. Scores therefore cannot be attributed to any one model, and every row here is blocklisted from weighted ranking. The four stored values are the Pareto column of Unbiased's own September 2026 model-card table (DeepSWE 74, Terminal-Bench 4.0 51, MMMU-Pro 78, HLE no-tools 49), produced on the public MIT-licensed pareto-evals harness. Unbiased also publishes ArXivMath 88, which BenchLM does not store: that harness reads the May 2026 MathArena ArXiv set, a different release from the June 2026 ArXivMath lane the catalog tracks. Unbiased states that measured task costs and a composite score are not published for this release. BenchLM does not republish the competitor column of that table.

4 of 446 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Radar

Pareto 26.9 release history

Full release history

Radar confirmed these at the source. Use Pareto 26.9 in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.

Questions

How does Pareto 26.9 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Pareto 26.9 has 4 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.

Is Pareto 26.9 good for knowledge and understanding?

Pareto 26.9 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Pareto 26.9 good for coding and programming?

Pareto 26.9 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Pareto 26.9 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Pareto 26.9 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Pareto 26.9 good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Pareto 26.9 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for multimodal and grounded tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Does Pareto 26.9 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Pareto 26.9 currently has 4 source-displayable rows across 446 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Pareto 26.9?

Pareto 26.9 has a reported context window of N/A in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Compare Pareto 26.9 with every tracked model489 comparisons

Last updated September 18, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Watch Pareto 26.9 in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.