Capability
Unranked
field median 56.2
Not eligible for a public rank
Superseded.Upstage has newer models in this line:Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 3
Released Jan 26, 2026 — see all recent releases
Decision reading
Solar Pro 3 is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 1 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.
Data as of September 10, 2026 · How the score is built
Share or export
Strongest published evidence
Instruction Following ranks #35. A well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.
Validate before choosing
1 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
$0.15input / $0.60 output
input median $1
blended $0.38
Speed
Not measured
field median 86.5 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
128Ktokens
field median 256,000
Maximum output length is tracked separately
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- AgenticNot measured
- CodingNot measured
- ReasoningNot measured
- KnowledgeNot measured
- MathNot measured
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. Following1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- solar-pro3Upstage API pricing
- Context window
- 128KUpstage API pricing
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Available through the Upstage Console API as solar-pro3 (a 102B-total, 12B-active MoE with a 131,072-token context), plus OpenRouter and other routers. Upstage lists it at $0.15 input and $0.60 output per million tokens.
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Superseded
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing recordUpstage API pricing
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingRank #35 of 123Percentile 72ndWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | 87.1 | #35 of 123 | 72nd | 5% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
Benchmark ledger
Inst. Following opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Inst. Following1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFBenchInstruction Following Benchmark | Score55.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 85% | Gap29.2 behind | WeightWeighted 70% | Provider exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Release date not sourced
Solar Pro 2Not publicly ranked · Price not listed
Jan 26, 2026 · you are here
Solar Pro 3Not publicly ranked · $0.15 / $0.6
Aug 11, 2026
Solar Pro 4Not publicly ranked · $0.3 / $1.2
Pro
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Solar Pro 3, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
Solar Pro 3 is a proprietary model with a 128K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Available through the Upstage Console API as solar-pro3 (a 102B-total, 12B-active MoE with a 131,072-token context), plus OpenRouter and other routers. Upstage lists it at $0.15 input and $0.60 output per million tokens.
Solar Pro 3 sits in the Solar family with Solar Pro 2, Solar Pro 4. Its explicit predecessor is Solar Pro 2. 1 of 434 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #35. a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.
Radar
Full release historySolar Pro 3 release history
Solar Pro 3 released
Upstage · Model release
Source confirmed
Radar confirmed these at the source. Use Solar Pro 3 in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.
Frequently asked questions
How does Solar Pro 3 perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Solar Pro 3 has 1 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Is Solar Pro 3 good for instruction following?
Solar Pro 3 ranks #35 out of 123 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 87.1/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Which sibling models are related to Solar Pro 3?
Solar Pro 3 belongs to the Solar family. Related tracked variants include Solar Pro 2, Solar Pro 4. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
Does Solar Pro 3 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Solar Pro 3 currently has 13 source-displayable rows across 434 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Solar Pro 3?
Solar Pro 3 has a documented context window of 128K. That figure is the maximum combined prompt and retained-conversation space reported for this exact model; it is not the maximum output length. The profile keeps output limits separate because providers often publish those limits independently.
Compare Solar Pro 3 with every tracked model482 comparisons
Last updated September 10, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Solar Pro 3 in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.