Model profile

Grok 4.1

Name: Grok 4.1
Author: xAI

xAISupersededReleased Nov 17, 2025

Data verified July 20, 2026

Superseded:xAI has released newer models in this line —Grok 4.20

Overall Score

59.97Public #51 of 200

Arena Elo

1459

Eligible category ranks

0of 8

Price (1M tokens)

Not listedAPI pricing

Speed

Not listed

Context

Evidence coverage

1 of 321 tracked benchmarks is published. 1 is verified and 0 provisional. 1 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 20, 2026Methodology

Published / tracked: 1 / 321
Verified: 1
Provisional: 0
Categories with evidence: 1 / 8

Agentic1 benchmark
Verified
Coding0 benchmarks
Not measured
Reasoning0 benchmarks
Not measured
Knowledge0 benchmarks
Not measured
Math0 benchmarks
Not measured
Multilingual0 benchmarks
Not measured
Multimodal0 benchmarks
Not measured
Inst. Following0 benchmarks
Not measured

ProprietaryNon-Reasoning

Confidence:

Low

base

Grok 4.1 ranks #51 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 59.97/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for BenchLM's verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.

Grok 4.1 is a proprietary model with a 1M token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.

This profile currently has 1 of 321 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 59.5–60.42

Grok 4
xAI
#5060.42
Grok 4 is #50 with a score of 60.42.
Compare
Grok 4.1Current model
xAI
#5159.97
Grok 4.1 is #51 with a score of 59.97.
GLM-5 (Reasoning)
Z.AI
#5259.77
GLM-5 (Reasoning) is #52 with a score of 59.77.
Compare
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
Alibaba
#5359.72
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is #53 with a score of 59.72.
Compare
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
#5459.66
Kimi K2.5 is #54 with a score of 59.66.
Compare
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax
#5559.52
MiniMax M2.5 is #55 with a score of 59.52.
Compare
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
#5659.5
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is #56 with a score of 59.5.
Compare

Category percentile

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

No eligible category percentile is available from the published evidence yet.

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
Category	Score	Rank	Percentile	Weight	Benchmarks	Evidence
AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified	78.4	Not ranked	Not available	22%	1 benchmark	Verified
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured	Not measured	Not ranked	Not available	20%	0 benchmarks	Not measured
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured	Not measured	Not ranked	Not available	17%	0 benchmarks	Not measured
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured	Not measured	Not ranked	Not available	12%	0 benchmarks	Not measured
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured	Not measured	Not ranked	Not available	5%	0 benchmarks	Not measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured	Not measured	Not ranked	Not available	7%	0 benchmarks	Not measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured	Not measured	Not ranked	Not available	12%	0 benchmarks	Not measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured	Not measured	Not ranked	Not available	5%	0 benchmarks	Not measured

Chatbot Arena performance

Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.

Chatbot Arena Elo, confidence interval, and vote count by evaluation view
View	Elo	Confidence interval	Votes
Text Overall	1459	±3.2	67,629
Coding	1492	±5.7	15,636
Math	1428	±9.4	4,223
Instruction Following	1431	±5.2	18,680
Creative Writing	1432	±6.8	9,794
Multi-turn	1462	±6.3	12,328
Hard Prompts	1474	±4.1	38,338
Hard Prompts (English)	1477	±5.3	18,772
Longer Query	1450	±5.2	19,971

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic1 benchmark

ResearchClawBenchBenchmark exact

13.5%Display only

Source: ResearchClawBench leaderboardProvenance: ResearchClawBench reports this model as ResearchHarness (Grok-4.1) in the official Pass@1 leaderboard. BenchLM stores the one-decimal RADS average on the local ResearchClawBench display key and excludes it from weighted rankings.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Grok 4.1 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Grok 4.1 has 1 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is Grok 4.1 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Grok 4.1 has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Does Grok 4.1 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. Grok 4.1 currently has 1 published benchmark scores out of the 321 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of Grok 4.1?

Grok 4.1 has a published context window of 1M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Related Resources

Last updated: July 20, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.