Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

AutomationBench

Data verified

An agent benchmark for completing automation workflows in reproducible task environments.

Top models on AutomationBench — October 29, 2026

As of October 29, 2026, MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the AutomationBench leaderboard with 62.2% , followed by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (60.5%) and Gemini 4 Carbon (53.9%).

27 modelsAgentic6% of Agentic reference weightCurrentUpdated October 29, 2026

Leaderboard (27 models)

AutomationBench leaderboard
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
62.2%
Not reportedClosed
2DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek
60.5%
Not reportedOpen
3Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle
53.9%
Not reportedClosed
4Atria Dawn PreviewShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
53.8%
Not reportedOpen
5MiMo-V2.6-ProXiaomi
53.1%
Not reportedOpen
6Ling 3.1 FlashInclusionAI
52.5%
Not reportedOpen
7MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
52.3%
Not reportedOpen
8Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
51.3%
Not reportedClosed
9Ultramarine 1 FlashPaper Instruments
50.2%
Not reportedClosed
10Muse Spark 1.3Meta
49.4%
Not reportedClosed
11GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AI
48.8%
Not reportedOpen
12GLM-5.3Z.AI
48.2%
Not reportedOpen
13Step 5 PreviewStepFun
44.0%
Not reportedOpen
14GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
41.4%
Not reportedClosed
15LFM3-1.7BLiquidAI
41.3%
Not reportedOpen
16Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
40.0%
Not reportedClosed
17GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
36.1%
Not reportedClosed
18GPT-6 SolOpenAI
33.2%
Not reportedClosed
19Hy4 previewTencent
32.1%
Not reportedOpen
20DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
31.8%
Not reportedOpen
21Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic
31.4%
Not reportedClosed
22Kimi K3Moonshot AI
30.8%
Not reportedOpen
23Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle
30.4%
Not reportedClosed
24LFM2.5-24B-A2BLiquidAI
27.7%
Not reportedOpen
25Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
27.3%
Not reportedOpen
26Claude Opus 5Anthropic
26.0%
Not reportedClosed
27DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731DeepSeek
25.1%
Not reportedOpen

According to BenchLM.ai, MiniMax M3.1 Flash leads the AutomationBench benchmark with a score of 62.2%, followed by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (60.5%) and Gemini 4 Carbon (53.9%). The scores show moderate spread, with meaningful differences between the top tier and mid-tier models.

27 models have been evaluated on AutomationBench. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. BenchAlign v5.8 gives AutomationBench 6% of the Agentic reference weight, so it moves the Agentic leaderboard and the overall ranking. Reference weights are relative weights in the calibrated model, not fixed shares of a score.

About AutomationBench

Year

2026

Tasks

600 public automation tasks

Format

Agent task-completion score

Difficulty

Long-horizon automation

Moonshot evaluates the 600-task public subset while following the official GitHub setup. BenchLM stores this provider-run result separately from Artificial Analysis AutomationBench-AA.

Freshness and provenance

Version

AutomationBench 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

Current

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does AutomationBench measure?

An agent benchmark for completing automation workflows in reproducible task environments.

Which model scores highest on AutomationBench?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash by MiniMax currently leads with a score of 62.2% on AutomationBench.

How many models are evaluated on AutomationBench?

27 AI models have published results on AutomationBench in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: October 29, 2026 · BenchLM version AutomationBench 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 6,100+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.