Kimi K3

Kimi K3 ranks #15 out of 212 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 72.14/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 52 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Kimi K3 ranks #18 out of 171 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 67.9/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K3 ranks #18 out of 144 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 61.4/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K3 ranks #18 out of 27 eligible models for reasoning and logic, with a public category score of 65.8/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K3 ranks #8 out of 119 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 68.1/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K3 ranks #1 out of 49 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 89.4/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K3 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for instruction following, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

No. Kimi K3 currently has 79 source-displayable rows across 645 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

Kimi K3 has a reported context window of 1.05M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.