Kimi K3

Kimi K3 ranks #7 out of 232 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 74.82/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 48 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Kimi K3 ranks #8 out of 183 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 72/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K3 ranks #6 out of 151 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 68/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K3 ranks #4 out of 152 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 71.9/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Kimi K3 ranks #1 out of 48 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 89.5/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

No. Kimi K3 currently has 75 source-displayable rows across 435 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

Kimi K3 has a reported context window of 1.05M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.