Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

BioMysteryBench Human Difficult (BioMysteryBench (human-difficult))

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

Computational biology challenges with objective answers that remained unsolved by independent human experts.

Benchmark score on BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) — November 13, 2026

We compile the BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) rows from provider self-reports. Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the table at 56.5%, followed by Claude Opus 5.5 (50.0%) and Claude Opus 5 (49.4%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

6 modelsKnowledgeCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated November 13, 2026

Benchmark score table (6 models)

All 6 results on this page were reported by the labs that built the models.

Benchmark score results for BioMysteryBench (human-difficult)
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleReported by Google
56.5%
Not reportedClosed
2Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicReported by Anthropic
50.0%
Not reportedClosed
3Claude Opus 5AnthropicReported by Anthropic
49.4%
Not reportedClosed
4Claude Sonnet 5.5AnthropicReported by Anthropic
44.7%
Not reportedClosed
5Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogleReported by Google
43.5%
Not reportedClosed
6Apodex 1.1ApodexReported by Apodex
35.3%
Not reportedClosed
  • Lab-reported
  • Benchmark-run
  • Independent
What the labels mean

Results reported by model developersUnranked

Labs ran these themselves, with a metric, split or setting the table above does not use. They take no rank here.

BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) results reported by model developers, unranked
Apodex 1.1Apodex23.5%Tasks solved (4 of 17)ReAct single agentThe stored row uses Agent Team; revised 17-task Human-difficult SetNot comparable to the scores aboveReported by Apodex

A lab’s own result is shown for reference. It never takes a rank on this board.

How we label sources

Among the reported BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) rows, Gemini 3.8 Flash is first at 56.5%. The third row is 7.1 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 21.2 points, so the table still separates the published systems.

6 models have been evaluated on BioMysteryBench (human-difficult). The benchmark falls in the Knowledge category. BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About BioMysteryBench (human-difficult)

Year

2026

Tasks

Human-difficult computational biology investigations

Format

Task score

Difficulty

Frontier computational biology

Section 8.17.1 reports the provider's revised human-difficult subset after removing six problems based on external feedback.

Freshness and provenance

Version

BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) measure?

Computational biology challenges with objective answers that remained unsolved by independent human experts.

Which model scores highest on BioMysteryBench (human-difficult)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash by Google currently leads with a score of 56.5% on BioMysteryBench (human-difficult).

How many models are evaluated on BioMysteryBench (human-difficult)?

6 AI models have published results on BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) in the BenchLM catalog.

Last updated: November 13, 2026 · BenchLM version BioMysteryBench (human-difficult) 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.