Capability
Unranked
field median 58.1
Not eligible for a public rank
Apodex 1.1
Released Aug 24, 2026 — see all recent releases
Decision reading
Apodex 1.1 is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 10 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.
Data as of August 24, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Coding ranks #43. Particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
Validate before choosing
10 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
API rate not published
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 97 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
N/A
field median 200,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic4/4 verified
- Coding2/2 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- Knowledge3/3 verified
- Math1/1 verified
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not publishedApodex pricing
- Context window
- N/A
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- The full Apodex 1.1 model powers Apodex's web workbench. Apodex says bare-model access will roll out through major API platforms, but no public API model ID, token rate, or model weights are available for the full 397B model.
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Current
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing recordApodex pricing
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%4 benchmarksVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 4 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #43 of 143Percentile 70thWeight 20%2 benchmarksVerified | 55.3 | #43 of 143 | 70th | 20% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified | 83.8 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 3 benchmarks | Verified |
| MathWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score77.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap18.3 behind | WeightWeighted 16% | Provider exact |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1Terminal-Bench 2.1 (provider run) | Score70.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GLM-5.3 · 88.2% | Gap17.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Agentic4 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1Terminal-Bench 2.1 (provider run) | Score70.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GLM-5.3 · 88.2% | Gap17.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| HLE w/ toolsHumanity's Last Exam with tools | Score56.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 64.7% | Gap8.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| APEX-Agents | Score38.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Grok 4.6 · 57.5% | Gap19 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| DeepSearchQA | Score92.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 95.0% | Gap2.6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Knowledge3 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLEHumanity's Last Exam | Score56.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 64.7% | Gap8.6 behind | WeightWeighted 45% | Provider exact |
| FrontierScience Research | Score63.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Apodex 1.1 · 63.3% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| BioMysteryBench (human-difficult)BioMysteryBench Human Difficult | Score35.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 49.4% | Gap14.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Math1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMO 2026International Mathematical Olympiad 2026 | Score31/42 | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 42/42 | Gap11.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Aug 24, 2026 · you are here
Apodex 1.1Not publicly ranked · Price not listed
full-397b · 397B
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Apodex 1.1, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
Apodex 1.1 is a proprietary model with a N/A context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
The full Apodex 1.1 model powers Apodex's web workbench. Apodex says bare-model access will roll out through major API platforms, but no public API model ID, token rate, or model weights are available for the full 397B model.
Official exact-value snapshot from Apodex's August 24, 2026 technical report. The stored APEX-Agents, FrontierScience Research, BioMysteryBench Human Difficult, HLE, and DeepSearchQA rows use the report's Agent Team setting; the corresponding ReAct results are 34.4, 55.0, 23.5, 53.2, and 88.2. The SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1 table reports one result per model. GDPVal win rate, FrontierFinance, YC-Bench, MathArena IMO 2025 and USAMO 2026, and IMO-ProofBench remain outside the current schema rather than being collapsed into non-equivalent fields. The report identifies a 397B full model but does not publish its context limit, weights, or a bare-model API price, so the row stays unranked.
Apodex 1.1 sits in the Apodex 1.1 family with Apodex 1.1 Mini. 10 of 404 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Coding at #43. particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
Radar
Full release historyApodex 1.1 release history
Apodex 1.1 released
Apodex · Model release
Source confirmed
Frequently asked questions
How does Apodex 1.1 perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Apodex 1.1 has 10 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Is Apodex 1.1 good for knowledge and understanding?
Apodex 1.1 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Apodex 1.1 good for coding and programming?
Apodex 1.1 ranks #43 out of 143 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 55.3/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Apodex 1.1 good for mathematics?
Apodex 1.1 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Apodex 1.1 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Apodex 1.1 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Which sibling models are related to Apodex 1.1?
Apodex 1.1 belongs to the Apodex 1.1 family. Related tracked variants include Apodex 1.1 Mini. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
Does Apodex 1.1 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Apodex 1.1 currently has 10 source-displayable rows across 404 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Apodex 1.1?
Apodex 1.1 has a reported context window of N/A in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Compare Apodex 1.1 with every tracked model394 comparisons
Last updated August 24, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Apodex 1.1 in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.