Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Vals Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vibe Code Bench 1-100)

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Data verified

Can a model extend one working web application across a long sequence of dependent requests?

Evaluation results published by Vals AI. Published leaderboard aggregates and evaluation settings only. Dataset contents are not included.

Vibe Code 1-100 score on Vibe Code Bench 1-100 — October 29, 2026

We mirror the published vibe code 1-100 score view for Vibe Code Bench 1-100. Muse Wonder Full leads the public snapshot at 33.98%, followed by Claude Opus 5.5 (30.36%) and Claude Opus 5 (28.53%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

26 modelsCodingCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated October 29, 2026

Vibe Code 1-100 score table (26 models)

Vibe Code 1-100 score results for Vibe Code Bench 1-100
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Muse Wonder FullMetaOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
33.98%
Not reportedClosed
2Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicOpenHandsOpenHands
30.36%
Not reportedClosed
3Claude Opus 5AnthropicOpenHandsOpenHands
28.53%
Not reportedClosed
4Claude Fable 5.1AnthropicOpenHandsOpenHands
28.00%
Not reportedClosed
5GPT-6 AstraOpenAIOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
27.64%
Not reportedClosed
6Muse WonderMetaOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
26.55%
Not reportedClosed
7Qwen3.8 Max InternalAlibabaOpenHandsOpenHands
24.83%
Not reportedUnknown
8GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
22.59%
Not reportedClosed
9Gemini 4 ArgonGoogleOpenHands · high reasoningOpenHands
21.20%
Not reportedClosed
10Muse Spark 1.3 MaxMetaOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
20.46%
Not reportedUnknown
11Claude Haiku 5.5AnthropicOpenHandsOpenHands
20.41%
Not reportedClosed
12GPT-5.6 SolOpenAIOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
20.01%
Not reportedClosed
13GLM-5.3Z.AIOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
19.99%
Not reportedOpen
14Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleOpenHands · high reasoningOpenHands
18.77%
Not reportedClosed
15Kimi K3Moonshot AIOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
18.24%
Not reportedOpen
16DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
17.53%
Not reportedOpen
17DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekOpenHands · high reasoningOpenHands
16.38%
Not reportedOpen
18GLM-5.3-FlashZ.AIOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
16.03%
Not reportedOpen
19GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIOpenHands · max reasoningOpenHands
14.82%
Not reportedClosed
20Grok 4.6xAIOpenHands · high reasoningOpenHands
14.75%
Not reportedClosed
21Mistral Large 4MistralOpenHands · high reasoningOpenHands
14.26%
Not reportedOpen
22Claude Sonnet 5AnthropicOpenHandsOpenHands
13.82%
Not reportedClosed
23Qwen3.8 MaxAlibabaOpenHandsOpenHands
12.83%
Not reportedOpen
24MiniMax M3MiniMaxOpenHandsOpenHands
9.22%
Not reportedOpen
25InklingThinking Machines LabOpenHands · 0.99 reasoningOpenHands
7.33%
Not reportedOpen
26Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogleOpenHands · high reasoningOpenHands
6.69%
Not reportedUnknown

How Vibe Code Bench 1-100 is shown here

BenchLM mirrors the public Vals AI Vibe Code Bench 1-100 leaderboard captured from https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vcb-1-100 and updated by Vals on October 29, 2026. The snapshot preserves overall scores, uncertainty, latency, cost-per-test metadata, and task-level scores where Vals publishes them.

Vibe Code Bench 1-100 is display only on BenchLM. Vals proprietary or Vals-hosted aggregate views are useful context, but BenchLM does not use them as weighted ranking inputs or as a replacement for benchmark-native source records.

Snapshot

26 Vals rows1 task viewsprivate datasetTasks: OverallDisplay only

The published Vibe Code Bench 1-100 snapshot places Muse Wonder Full first at 33.98%. The third row is 5.45 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 13.52 points, so the table still separates the published systems.

26 models have been evaluated on Vibe Code Bench 1-100. The benchmark falls in the Coding category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. Vibe Code Bench 1-100 is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About Vibe Code Bench 1-100

Year

2026

Tasks

Long chains of dependent web-application change requests

Format

Accuracy score

Difficulty

Long-horizon software delivery

Each run starts from a working web application and applies a long chain of dependent change requests, so an early mistake compounds through the rest of the sequence. That is a different question from the single-build Vibe Code Bench v1.1 board, which is why BenchLM keeps it on its own key. Private task set, external runner, display only.

Freshness and provenance

Version

Vibe Code Bench 1-100 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does Vibe Code Bench 1-100 measure?

Can a model extend one working web application across a long sequence of dependent requests?

Which model leads the published Vibe Code Bench 1-100 snapshot?

Muse Wonder Full currently leads the published Vibe Code Bench 1-100 snapshot with 33.98% vibe code 1-100 score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on Vibe Code Bench 1-100?

The October 29, 2026 snapshot contains 26 AI models.

Last updated: October 29, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 6,100+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.