Skip to main content
Radar

Every change to the models you run, with its source and its date. Releases, price changes, retirements, API changes, and incidents.Every change to the models you run, with its source.

Follow model changes
Learn, research, or solve a problem · Planning and difficult reasoning

Best AI model for reasoning — September 2026

On BenchLM's public evidence, GPT-6 Astra has the highest reasoning score estimate among the models that meet this page's constraints (89.5). Reasoning evidence is limited and includes specific long-context and abstract tasks.

Shortlist data updated

Share this shortlist

Share on XLinkedIn

This address is permanent. It always shows the current shortlist for this job, with the date the data was last updated. The embed shows the same shortlist on your site and links back here.

The shortlist for reasoning

Constraints on this page: a builder choosing by accuracy, hosted processing allowed, any price, ordinary input size. Change any of them under Refine. A small score gap does not establish a reliably better model.

Compare GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Fable 5.1Full reasoning leaderboard

  1. 01GPT-6 AstraBest fit

    OpenAI · Proprietary

    89.5

    Reasoning score estimate

    • Highest reasoning estimate among models that meet every stated constraint
    • $20.00 for the stated workload
    • 1.05M context

    Model page and evidence

  2. 02Claude Fable 5.1

    Anthropic · Proprietary

    79.4

    Reasoning score estimate

    • Estimate 79.4 on the same reasoning evidence
    • $20.00 for the stated workload
    • 1M context

    Model page and evidenceCompare with GPT-6 Astra

  3. 03Kimi K3

    Moonshot AI · Pending

    78.5

    Reasoning score estimate

    • Estimate 78.5 on the same reasoning evidence
    • $6.00 for the stated workload
    • 1.05M context

    Model page and evidenceCompare with GPT-6 Astra

  4. 04MiniMax M3

    MiniMax · Open Weight

    78.0

    Reasoning score estimate

    • Estimate 78.0 on the same reasoning evidence
    • $0.54 for the stated workload
    • 1M context
    • Open weights, so it can run on your own hardware

    Model page and evidenceCompare with GPT-6 Astra

  5. 05Muse Spark 1.3

    Meta · Proprietary

    78.0

    Reasoning score estimate

    • Estimate 78.0 on the same reasoning evidence
    • $2.10 for the stated workload
    • 1M context

    Model page and evidenceCompare with GPT-6 Astra

Refine for your situation

Each link opens the selector with one answer changed. The address carries the answers, so your version is as shareable as this page.

A decision model maps your sentence to the selector’s questions. The shortlist comes from public evidence only, and nothing is stored.

What this shortlist rests on

The reasoning surface. The category score is a weighted average of these public benchmarks.

What to verify before choosing

  • Reasoning evidence is limited and includes specific long-context and abstract tasks.
  • Composite scores are estimates. A small score gap does not establish a reliably better model.

Try three representative examples of your own work. Compare errors, time, cost, and the tools available in your actual setup.

Questions

Which AI model is best for reasoning?

On BenchLM's public evidence, GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI has the highest reasoning score estimate among models that meet the page's default constraints (89.5). Ordered by task score under the stated constraints. Reasoning evidence is limited and includes specific long-context and abstract tasks.

What are the alternatives to GPT-6 Astra for reasoning?

Claude Fable 5.1 (79.4), Kimi K3 (78.5), MiniMax M3 (78.0), Muse Spark 1.3 (78.0) follow on the same evidence. A small gap does not establish a reliably better model; compare them on three representative examples of your own work.

How does BenchLM pick the best ai model for reasoning?

The page runs the LLM Selector with fixed answers: a builder choosing by accuracy, hosted processing allowed, any price, ordinary input size. The selector uses the reasoning evidence surface, filters by the stated constraints, and orders by that evidence. It never adds a hidden fit score or a bonus for open weights or reasoning style.

Can I change the constraints?

Yes. Every link under "Refine" opens the selector with one answer changed, and the address carries the answers so a result can be shared or reopened against the current dataset.

Method: bench-align-v5.5-2026-09-04. Read the methodology and benchmark confidence pages for how scores and verification statuses are produced.

Watch the reasoning shortlist

One weekly email when rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this shortlist worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.