Skip to main content

Model comparison

Agents-A1 vs Inkling

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

InternScience
63/100
Margin
6.0pts
winning →
Thinking Machines Lab
69/100
2 category wins1 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Agents-A1 unranked; Inkling #17

Evidence parity. Agents-A1 and Inkling share 2 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Agents-A1; 14 to Inkling.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
2
Agents-A1 only
4
Inkling only
14
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick Inkling if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Agents-A1 only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Inkling is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Inkling's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 51.7 against 47.6. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 47.6% to 46%. Agents-A1 does hit back in instruction following, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Agents-A1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Inkling is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Inkling gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Agents-A1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Agents-A1 and Inkling
CategoryAgents-A1ΔInkling
Inst. FollowingAgents-A194.8Margin 15.0Inkling79.8
AgenticAgents-A175.5Margin 6.1Inkling69.4
KnowledgeAgents-A147.6Margin 4.1Inkling51.7
CodingAgents-A1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling68.6
ReasoningAgents-A160.2MarginNo overlapInklingNot measured
MathAgents-A1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling97.1
MultimodalAgents-A1Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling76.5

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Agents-A1B · Inkling
  1. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 47.6%B 46%
    Winner: Agents-A1Δ 1.6
    HLE: Agents-A1 scored 47.6%; Inkling scored 46%. Agents-A1 wins this benchmark.
  2. BrowseComp

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 75.5%B 77.1%
    Winner: InklingΔ 1.6
    BrowseComp: Agents-A1 scored 75.5%; Inkling scored 77.1%. Inkling wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricAgents-A1InklingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensAgents-A1Not availableInkling$1.87 input / $4.68 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondAgents-A1Not availableInklingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenAgents-A1Not availableInklingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensAgents-A1262KInkling1MInkling lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticAgents-A1 wins
BenchmarkAgents-A1InklingResult
BrowseCompSource 75.5%77.1%Inkling leads
HLE w/ toolsSource 47.6%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 38.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.1%Not comparable
Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource 1258Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkAgents-A1InklingResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkAgents-A1InklingResult
LongBench v2Source 60.2%Not comparable
KnowledgeInkling wins
BenchmarkAgents-A1InklingResult
HLESource 47.6%46%Agents-A1 leads
GPQASource 87.9%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.9%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 30%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkAgents-A1InklingResult
AIME26Source 97.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkAgents-A1InklingResult
MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 78.1%Not comparable
Inst. FollowingAgents-A1 wins
BenchmarkAgents-A1InklingResult
IFEvalSource 94.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 79.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Agents-A1 or Inkling?

Inkling is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 63. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 47.6% and 46%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Agents-A1 or Inkling?

Inkling has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 51.7 versus 47.6. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Agents-A1 or Inkling?

Agents-A1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 69.4. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Agents-A1 or Inkling?

Agents-A1 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 94.8 versus 79.8. Inkling stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.