Skip to main content

Agents-A1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

Agents-A1 leads for most workloads.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

Agents-A1

63

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

60

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Agents-A1 unranked · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #28

Pick Agents-A1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkAgents-A1ΔQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Knowledge47.6 36.083.6
Agentic75.5 19.156.4
Inst. Following94.8 1.493.4
Reasoning60.2tie60.2
Coding72.0
Multilingual82.2
Multimodal77.2

Operational Comparison

Agents-A1

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

262K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Agents-A1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Agents-A1 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 63 versus 60. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Agents-A1's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 75.5 against 56.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is BrowseComp, 75.5% to 63.8%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Agents-A1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Agents-A1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 63 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is BrowseComp, where the scores are 75.5% and 63.8%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Agents-A1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.6 versus 47.6. Agents-A1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for reasoning, Agents-A1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Agents-A1 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are effectively tied for reasoning here, both landing at 60.2 on average.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Agents-A1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Agents-A1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.5 versus 56.4. Inside this category, Tau2-Telecom is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Agents-A1 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Agents-A1 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 94.8 versus 93.4. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 7, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.