Skip to main content

Model comparison

Celeris-1 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Celeris
N/A
No comparison
54.48/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Celeris-1 unranked (Not scored); GPT-5.1-Codex-Max #90 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Celeris-1 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Celeris-1; 13 to GPT-5.1-Codex-Max.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
Celeris-1 only
1
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max only
13
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Celeris-1 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens for Celeris-1. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 8K for Celeris-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricCeleris-1GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensCeleris-1$2 input / $6 outputGPT-5.1-Codex-Max$1.25 input / $10 outputCeleris-1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondCeleris-1Not availableGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenCeleris-1Not availableGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensCeleris-18KGPT-5.1-Codex-Max400KGPT-5.1-Codex-Max lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 83%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.17%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 40.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 67.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 5.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 34.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.0%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 23.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -6.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 39.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 74.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 72.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkCeleris-1GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Celeris-1 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Celeris-1 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max today?

Celeris-1: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.