GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
According to BenchLM.ai, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ranks #31 out of 119 models on the provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 75/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for BenchLM's verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max is a proprietary model with a 400K token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.
This profile currently has 18 of 225 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Its strongest category is Mathematics (#4), while its weakest is Knowledge (#21). This performance profile makes it particularly strong for mathematical reasoning, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis.
Ranking Distribution
Category rank across 8 benchmark categories — sorted by best rank
Category Performance
Scores across all benchmark categories (0-100 scale)
Category Breakdown
Agentic
Coding
Reasoning
#6Knowledge
#21Math
#4Multilingual
#16Multimodal
#9Inst. Following
#16Chatbot Arena Performance
Benchmark Details
Only benchmark rows with an attached exact-source record are shown here. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows are hidden from model pages.
Compare This Model
See how GPT-5.1-Codex-Max stacks up against similar models
Frequently Asked Questions
How does GPT-5.1-Codex-Max perform overall in AI benchmarks?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max currently ranks #31 out of 119 models on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 75 (estimated). It is created by OpenAI and features a 400K context window.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Max good for knowledge and understanding?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ranks #21 out of 119 models in knowledge and understanding benchmarks with an average score of 78.5. There are stronger options in this category.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Max good for coding and programming?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has visible benchmark coverage in coding and programming, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Max good for reasoning and logic?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ranks #6 out of 119 models in reasoning and logic benchmarks with an average score of 88.5. It is among the top performers in this category.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Max good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Max good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ranks #9 out of 119 models in multimodal and grounded tasks benchmarks with an average score of 89.2. It is among the top performers in this category.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Max good for instruction following?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ranks #16 out of 119 models in instruction following benchmarks with an average score of 87.9. There are stronger options in this category.
Does GPT-5.1-Codex-Max have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max currently has 18 published benchmark scores out of the 225 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has a context window of 400K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Don't miss the next GPT moment
Which models moved up, what’s new, and what it costs. One email a week, 3-min read.
Free. One email per week.