Skip to main content

Model comparison

Celeris-1 vs Mistral Medium 3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Celeris
N/A
No comparison
43.2/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Celeris-1 unranked (Not scored); Mistral Medium 3 #156 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Celeris-1 and Mistral Medium 3 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Celeris-1; 13 to Mistral Medium 3.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
Celeris-1 only
1
Mistral Medium 3 only
13
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Celeris-1 and Mistral Medium 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Celeris-1 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Medium 3. Mistral Medium 3 has the larger context window at 128K, compared with 8K for Celeris-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricCeleris-1Mistral Medium 3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensCeleris-1$2 input / $6 outputMistral Medium 3$0.4 input / $2 outputMistral Medium 3 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondCeleris-1Not availableMistral Medium 357 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenCeleris-1Not availableMistral Medium 31.20 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensCeleris-18KMistral Medium 3128KMistral Medium 3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkCeleris-1Mistral Medium 3Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 24.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkCeleris-1Mistral Medium 3Result
AA-SciCodeSource 33.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkCeleris-1Mistral Medium 3Result
AA-LCRSource 28.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkCeleris-1Mistral Medium 3Result
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 12.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 57.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -31.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 18.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 60.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkCeleris-1Mistral Medium 3Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 53.0%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1109Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkCeleris-1Mistral Medium 3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 39.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Celeris-1 and Mistral Medium 3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Celeris-1 and Mistral Medium 3 today?

Celeris-1: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Medium 3: $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.