Skip to main content

Model comparison

Celeris-1 vs Ornith-1.0-397B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Celeris
N/A
No comparison
DeepReinforce AI
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Celeris-1 and Ornith-1.0-397B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Celeris-1; 7 to Ornith-1.0-397B.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
Celeris-1 only
1
Ornith-1.0-397B only
7
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Celeris-1 and Ornith-1.0-397B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Celeris-1 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ornith-1.0-397B. Ornith-1.0-397B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 8K for Celeris-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricCeleris-1Ornith-1.0-397BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensCeleris-1$2 input / $6 outputOrnith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 outputOrnith-1.0-397B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondCeleris-1Not availableOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenCeleris-1Not availableOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensCeleris-18KOrnith-1.0-397B256KOrnith-1.0-397B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkCeleris-1Ornith-1.0-397BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 77.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkCeleris-1Ornith-1.0-397BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 82.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 62.2%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.9%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 48.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.5%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkCeleris-1Ornith-1.0-397BResult
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Celeris-1 and Ornith-1.0-397B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Celeris-1 and Ornith-1.0-397B today?

Celeris-1: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Ornith-1.0-397B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.