Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.74/100
No comparison
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3.5 Sonnet #132 (Estimated); Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude 3.5 Sonnet; 4 to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude 3.5 Sonnet only
3
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only
4
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Claude 3.5 Sonnet makes more sense if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 200K context window; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct is the better fit if its strengths line up with your actual workload.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
CategoryClaude 3.5 SonnetΔMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
KnowledgeClaude 3.5 Sonnet59.4Margin 18.5Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct40.9
CodingClaude 3.5 Sonnet49.0MarginNo overlapMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measured
MathClaude 3.5 Sonnet1.6MarginNo overlapMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measured
Inst. FollowingClaude 3.5 SonnetNot measuredMarginNo overlapMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct75.8

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Claude 3.5 SonnetB · Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 59.4%B 40.9%
    Winner: Claude 3.5 SonnetΔ 18.5
    GPQA: Claude 3.5 Sonnet scored 59.4%; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct scored 40.9%. Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3.5 SonnetMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3.5 Sonnet$3 input / $15 outputMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3.5 SonnetNot availableMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3.5 SonnetNot availableMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3.5 Sonnet200KMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct128KClaude 3.5 Sonnet lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
BFCL v4Source 44.2%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 49%Not comparable
KnowledgeClaude 3.5 Sonnet wins
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
GPQASource 59.4%40.9%Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
MMLU-ReduxSource 78.1%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 40.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 2.069%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3.5 SonnetMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructResult
IFEvalSource 75.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.4 versus 40.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.