Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-5 mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
21.39/100
Margin
22.5pts
winning →
43.93/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Haiku #194 (Supported); GPT-5 mini #153 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5 mini share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Claude 3 Haiku; 1 to GPT-5 mini.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 3 Haiku only
12
GPT-5 mini only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5 mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5 mini is priced at $0.25 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens for Claude 3 Haiku. Claude 3 Haiku has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for GPT-5 mini.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5 miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Haiku$0.25 input / $1.25 outputGPT-5 mini$0.25 input / $2 outputClaude 3 Haiku has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 Haiku138 tok/sGPT-5 mini86 tok/sClaude 3 Haiku has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 Haiku1.16 sGPT-5 mini65.32 sClaude 3 Haiku reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Haiku200KGPT-5 mini128KClaude 3 Haiku lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5 miniResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 21.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5 miniResult
AA-SciCodeSource 18.6%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.17%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5 miniResult
AA-LCRSource 21.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5 miniResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 3.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 37.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -47.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5 miniResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 30.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuGPT-5 miniResult
AA-IFBenchSource 36.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5 mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-5 mini today?

Claude 3 Haiku: $0.25 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens GPT-5 mini: $0.25 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.