Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Nova Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

21.39/100
Margin
1.1pts
← winning
Amazon
20.32/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Haiku #194 (Supported); Nova Pro #196 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Haiku and Nova Pro share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude 3 Haiku; 0 to Nova Pro.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
12
Claude 3 Haiku only
0
Nova Pro only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Haiku and Nova Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Haiku has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Nova Pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 HaikuNova ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Haiku$0.25 input / $1.25 outputNova ProNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 Haiku138 tok/sNova Pro141 tok/sNova Pro has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 Haiku1.16 sNova Pro0.81 sNova Pro reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Haiku200KNova Pro128KClaude 3 Haiku lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuNova ProResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 21.1%14%Claude 3 Haiku leads
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuNova ProResult
AA-SciCodeSource 18.6%20.8%Nova Pro leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuNova ProResult
AA-LCRSource 21.0%19.0%Claude 3 Haiku leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuNova ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 3.9%7.7%Nova Pro leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 37.4%49.9%Nova Pro leads
AA-HLESource 3.9%3.4%Claude 3 Haiku leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -47.6%-47.6%Tie
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.2%17.0%Claude 3 Haiku leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.2%77.9%Nova Pro leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuNova ProResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 30.8%44.3%Nova Pro leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuNova ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 36.1%38.1%Nova Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Haiku and Nova Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Haiku and Nova Pro today?

Claude 3 Haiku: $0.25 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens Nova Pro: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.