Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeekMath V2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Anthropic
41.13/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); DeepSeekMath V2 #119 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeekMath V2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 0 to DeepSeekMath V2.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 3 Opus only
5
DeepSeekMath V2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeekMath V2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for DeepSeekMath V2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeekMath V2. Claude 3 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeekMath V2.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusDeepSeekMath V2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputDeepSeekMath V2$0 input / $0 outputDeepSeekMath V2 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableDeepSeekMath V2Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableDeepSeekMath V2Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KDeepSeekMath V2128KClaude 3 Opus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeekMath V2Result
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusDeepSeekMath V2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeekMath V2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeekMath V2 today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens DeepSeekMath V2: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.