Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Anthropic
41.13/100
Margin
18.0pts
winning →
59.1/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); GPT-5.2-Codex #58 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2-Codex share 4 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude 3 Opus; 11 to GPT-5.2-Codex.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
4
Claude 3 Opus only
1
GPT-5.2-Codex only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2-Codex is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.2-Codex. GPT-5.2-Codex has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for Claude 3 Opus.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2-CodexComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputGPT-5.2-Codex$1.75 input / $14 outputGPT-5.2-Codex has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableGPT-5.2-Codex123 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableGPT-5.2-Codex87.34 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KGPT-5.2-Codex400KGPT-5.2-Codex lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2-CodexResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 92.1%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 51.79%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 26.0%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2-CodexResult
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%54.6%GPT-5.2-Codex leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 37.91%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2-CodexResult
AA-LCRSource 75.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 8.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2-CodexResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%40.1%GPT-5.2-Codex leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%89.9%GPT-5.2-Codex leads
AA-HLESource 3.1%33.5%GPT-5.2-Codex leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -2.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 40.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 72.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2-CodexResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 76.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2-CodexResult
AA-IFBenchSource 77.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2-Codex on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and GPT-5.2-Codex today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-5.2-Codex: $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.