Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Grok 3 [Beta]

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Anthropic
41.13/100
Margin
0.7pts
← winning
40.43/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); Grok 3 [Beta] #171 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and Grok 3 [Beta] share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 2 to Grok 3 [Beta].

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 3 Opus only
5
Grok 3 [Beta] only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and Grok 3 [Beta] is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Grok 3 [Beta].

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusGrok 3 [Beta]Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KGrok 3 [Beta]128KClaude 3 Opus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 3 [Beta]Result
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 3 [Beta]Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusGrok 3 [Beta]Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 3.793%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and Grok 3 [Beta] on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and Grok 3 [Beta] today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Grok 3 [Beta]: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.