Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Anthropic
41.13/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract share 4 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude 3 Opus; 11 to LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
4
Claude 3 Opus only
1
LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract128KClaude 3 Opus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 8.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%3.0%Claude 3 Opus leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%1.0%Claude 3 Opus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%28.9%Claude 3 Opus leads
AA-HLESource 3.1%5.1%LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -83.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 5.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 94.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
Liquid Extract JSON ValiditySource 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract F1Source 99.6%Not comparable
Liquid Extract VLM JudgeSource 90.6%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 26.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusLFM2.5-VL-1.6B-ExtractResult
AA-IFBenchSource 33.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.