Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Anthropic
41.13/100
Margin
17.5pts
winning →
Xiaomi
58.62/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 3 Opus #168 (Supported); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Opus and MiMo-V2.5 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude 3 Opus; 11 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 3 Opus only
5
MiMo-V2.5 only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Opus and MiMo-V2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 3 Opus.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Opus$15 input / $75 outputMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 OpusNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 OpusNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Opus200KMiMo-V2.51MMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5Result
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5Result
AA Coding IndexSource 19.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 23.3%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 48.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 OpusMiMo-V2.5Result
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1291Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Opus and MiMo-V2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Opus and MiMo-V2.5 today?

Claude 3 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.