Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Claude 3 Opus is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 53 to 39. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 3 Opus gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 16K for Phi-4.
Pick Claude 3 Opus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Phi-4 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Claude 3 Opus
50.2
Phi-4
70.5
Claude 3 Opus
27.7
Phi-4
82.6
Claude 3 Opus
73
Phi-4
80.6
Claude 3 Opus is ahead overall, 53 to 39. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 53 and 82.6.
Phi-4 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.5 versus 50.2. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Phi-4 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 27.7. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Phi-4 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.6 versus 73. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.