Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus #142 (Supported); Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 1 to Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Claude 4.1 Opus only
- 3
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Claude 4.1 Opus | Δ | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Claude 4.1 Opus74.5 | MarginNo overlap | Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 output | Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus29 tok/s | Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus1.66 s | Claude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus200K | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking200K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| JobBenchSource | 21.9% | — | Not comparable |
Coding2 benchmarks
Knowledge1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 28.2% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1207 | 1219 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking today?
Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.