Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus vs LFM2-24B-A2B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus #149 (Supported); LFM2-24B-A2B #207 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2-24B-A2B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 0 to LFM2-24B-A2B.
Updated July 28, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude 4.1 Opus only
- 4
- LFM2-24B-A2B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2-24B-A2B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for LFM2-24B-A2B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Claude 4.1 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2-24B-A2B. Claude 4.1 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for LFM2-24B-A2B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus | LFM2-24B-A2B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 output | LFM2-24B-A2B$0 input / $0 output | LFM2-24B-A2B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus29 tok/s | LFM2-24B-A2B92 tok/s | LFM2-24B-A2B has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus1.66 s | LFM2-24B-A2B0.42 s | LFM2-24B-A2B reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus200K | LFM2-24B-A2B32K | Claude 4.1 Opus lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | LFM2-24B-A2B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| JobBenchSource | 21.9% | — | Not comparable |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | LFM2-24B-A2B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 74.5% | — | Not comparable |
Knowledge1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | LFM2-24B-A2B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 28.2% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | LFM2-24B-A2B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1202 | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2-24B-A2B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2-24B-A2B today?
Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens LFM2-24B-A2B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.