Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus vs LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

45.87/100
Margin
4.6pts
← winning
41.25/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: Claude 4.1 Opus supported; LFM2.5-8B-A1B estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2.5-8B-A1B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 17 to LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude 4.1 Opus only
3
LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2.5-8B-A1B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 4.1 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2.5-8B-A1B. Claude 4.1 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2.5-8B-A1B
CategoryClaude 4.1 OpusΔLFM2.5-8B-A1B
CodingClaude 4.1 Opus74.5MarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot measured
MathClaude 4.1 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0
Inst. FollowingClaude 4.1 OpusNot measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 OpusLFM2.5-8B-A1BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus29 tok/sLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus1.66 sLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus200KLFM2.5-8B-A1B128KClaude 4.1 Opus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
JobBenchSource 21.9%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 49.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 16.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.5%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 4.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 7.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 28.2%8.3%Claude 4.1 Opus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 6.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -33.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 9.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 47.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
MATH-500Source 88.8%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 42.5%Not comparable
AIME26Source 50.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1211Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
IFEvalSource 91.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 56.5%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 55.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2.5-8B-A1B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and LFM2.5-8B-A1B today?

Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens LFM2.5-8B-A1B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.