Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus vs Llama 3.1 405B
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus #142 (Supported); Llama 3.1 405B #102 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and Llama 3.1 405B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 10 to Llama 3.1 405B.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Claude 4.1 Opus only
- 3
- Llama 3.1 405B only
- 10
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and Llama 3.1 405B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude 4.1 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 3.1 405B. Claude 4.1 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Llama 3.1 405B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Claude 4.1 Opus | Δ | Llama 3.1 405B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Claude 4.1 Opus74.5 | MarginNo overlap | Llama 3.1 405BNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus | Llama 3.1 405B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 output | Llama 3.1 405B$0 input / $0 output | Llama 3.1 405B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus29 tok/s | Llama 3.1 405B29 tok/s | Measured throughput is equal. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus1.66 s | Llama 3.1 405B2.19 s | Claude 4.1 Opus reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus200K | Llama 3.1 405B128K | Claude 4.1 Opus lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic2 benchmarks
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Llama 3.1 405B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 28.2% | 8.5% | Claude 4.1 Opus leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 51.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 4.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -17.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 22.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 51.0% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Llama 3.1 405B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1207 | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Llama 3.1 405B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 39.0% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Llama 3.1 405B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and Llama 3.1 405B today?
Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 3.1 405B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.