Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus vs Mistral 8x7B v0.2
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus #142 (Supported); Mistral 8x7B v0.2 #178 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral 8x7B v0.2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 0 to Mistral 8x7B v0.2.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude 4.1 Opus only
- 4
- Mistral 8x7B v0.2 only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral 8x7B v0.2 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Mistral 8x7B v0.2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Claude 4.1 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Mistral 8x7B v0.2. Claude 4.1 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Mistral 8x7B v0.2.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 output | Mistral 8x7B v0.2$0 input / $0 output | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus29 tok/s | Mistral 8x7B v0.2Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus1.66 s | Mistral 8x7B v0.2Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus200K | Mistral 8x7B v0.232K | Claude 4.1 Opus lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| JobBenchSource | 21.9% | — | Not comparable |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 74.5% | — | Not comparable |
Knowledge1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 28.2% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus | Mistral 8x7B v0.2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1207 | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral 8x7B v0.2 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and Mistral 8x7B v0.2 today?
Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral 8x7B v0.2: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.