Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

45.88/100
Margin
7.1pts
winning →
52.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus #142 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano 30B #98 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 14 to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude 4.1 Opus only
3
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
14
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 4.1 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B. Claude 4.1 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4.1 Opus and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
CategoryClaude 4.1 OpusΔNemotron 3 Nano 30B
CodingClaude 4.1 Opus74.5MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 OpusNemotron 3 Nano 30BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus29 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/sNemotron 3 Nano 30B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus1.66 sNemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 sClaude 4.1 Opus reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus200KNemotron 3 Nano 30B32KClaude 4.1 Opus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
JobBenchSource 21.9%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 40.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 484Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 2.0%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.5%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 29.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 14.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-LCRSource 33.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 28.2%14.2%Claude 4.1 Opus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 10.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 82.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1207Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusNemotron 3 Nano 30BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 71.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B today?

Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.