Skip to main content

Claude 4 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude 4 Sonnet

52

VS

Gemini 2.5 Pro

67

1 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 4 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Claude 4 Sonnet
72.7vs63.8

+8.9 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude 4 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

$1.25 / $5

Speed

40 t/s

117 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.33s

21.19s

Context Window

200K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 4 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 67 to 52. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemini 2.5 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 4 Sonnet.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Claude 4 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 67 to 52. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 72.7% and 63.8%.

Which is better for coding, Claude 4 Sonnet or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude 4 Sonnet has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.7 versus 63.8. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.