Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4 Sonnet vs Nova Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

42.79/100
Margin
22.5pts
← winning
Amazon
20.32/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4 Sonnet #158 (Supported); Nova Pro #196 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4 Sonnet and Nova Pro share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Claude 4 Sonnet; 0 to Nova Pro.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
12
Claude 4 Sonnet only
4
Nova Pro only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4 Sonnet and Nova Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 4 Sonnet has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Nova Pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4 Sonnet and Nova Pro
CategoryClaude 4 SonnetΔNova Pro
CodingClaude 4 Sonnet72.7MarginNo overlapNova ProNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4 SonnetNova ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4 Sonnet$3 input / $15 outputNova ProNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4 Sonnet40 tok/sNova Pro141 tok/sNova Pro has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4 Sonnet1.33 sNova Pro0.81 sNova Pro reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4 Sonnet200KNova Pro128KClaude 4 Sonnet lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetNova ProResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 52.3%14%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
Gert LabsSource 39.66%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 18.4%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetNova ProResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 72.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 37.3%20.8%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetNova ProResult
AA-LCRSource 44.3%19.0%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
CritPtSource 1.1%0.0%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetNova ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.5%7.7%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.3%49.9%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
AA-HLESource 4.0%3.4%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -9.2%-47.6%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.4%17.0%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 40.8%77.9%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetNova ProResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 62.4%44.3%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1178Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetNova ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 45.4%38.1%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4 Sonnet and Nova Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4 Sonnet and Nova Pro today?

Claude 4 Sonnet: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens Nova Pro: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.