Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4 Sonnet vs o1-pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.92/100
Margin
3.1pts
winning →
OpenAI
45.03/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4 Sonnet #168 (Supported); o1-pro #148 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4 Sonnet and o1-pro share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to Claude 4 Sonnet; 1 to o1-pro.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude 4 Sonnet only
15
o1-pro only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4 Sonnet and o1-pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o1-pro is priced at $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens for Claude 4 Sonnet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4 Sonnet and o1-pro
CategoryClaude 4 SonnetΔo1-pro
CodingClaude 4 Sonnet72.7MarginNo overlapo1-proNot measured
KnowledgeClaude 4 SonnetNot measuredMarginNo overlapo1-pro79.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4 Sonneto1-proComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4 Sonnet$3 input / $15 outputo1-pro$150 input / $600 outputClaude 4 Sonnet has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4 Sonnet40 tok/so1-proNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4 Sonnet1.33 so1-proNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4 Sonnet200Ko1-pro200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4 Sonneto1-proResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 52.3%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 39.66%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 18.4%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4 Sonneto1-proResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 72.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 37.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4 Sonneto1-proResult
AA-LCRSource 44.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 1.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4 Sonneto1-proResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.5%18.9%Claude 4 Sonnet leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -9.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 40.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 79%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4 Sonneto1-proResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 62.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1175Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4 Sonneto1-proResult
AA-IFBenchSource 45.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4 Sonnet and o1-pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4 Sonnet and o1-pro today?

Claude 4 Sonnet: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens o1-pro: $150.00 input / $600.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026