Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking vs GPT-5.4 mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
56.77/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); GPT-5.4 mini #75 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.4 mini share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking; 29 to GPT-5.4 mini.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking only
1
GPT-5.4 mini only
29
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.4 mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.4 mini has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.4 mini
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingΔGPT-5.4 mini
AgenticClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 mini65.7
KnowledgeClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 mini47.8
MathClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 mini21.7
MultimodalClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 mini76.6

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.4 miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-5.4 mini$0.75 input / $4.5 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-5.4 mini201 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-5.4 mini3.85 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinking200KGPT-5.4 mini400KGPT-5.4 mini lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.4 miniResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 60%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 72.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 57.7%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 42.9%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 83.3%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 30.2%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 28.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1171Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.4 miniResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 11.39%47.97%GPT-5.4 mini leads
AA Coding IndexSource 56.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 49.9%Not comparable
FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource 27.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.4 miniResult
AA-LCRSource 69.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 10.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.4 miniResult
GPQASource 88%Not comparable
HLESource 41.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 28.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.5%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -18.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 37.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.4 miniResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 28.280%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.080%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.4 miniResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1152Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 76.6%Not comparable
MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource 78%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 73.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.4 miniResult
AA-IFBenchSource 73.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.4 mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.4 mini today?

GPT-5.4 mini: $0.75 input / $4.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.