Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking vs MAI-Thinking-1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and MAI-Thinking-1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking; 13 to MAI-Thinking-1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking only
2
MAI-Thinking-1 only
13
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and MAI-Thinking-1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MAI-Thinking-1 has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMAI-Thinking-1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMAI-Thinking-1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinking200KMAI-Thinking-1256KMAI-Thinking-1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMAI-Thinking-1Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMAI-Thinking-1Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 11.39%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMAI-Thinking-1Result
Graphwalks BFS 128KSource 90%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMAI-Thinking-1Result
GPQASource 84.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 84.2%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 85%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 31%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMAI-Thinking-1Result
AIME 2025Source 97%Not comparable
AIME26Source 94.5%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 84.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMAI-Thinking-1Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1152Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMAI-Thinking-1Result
IFBenchSource 85%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and MAI-Thinking-1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.