Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking vs o3-mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
OpenAI
47.41/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); o3-mini #136 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and o3-mini share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking; 10 to o3-mini.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking only
2
o3-mini only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and o3-mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinkingo3-miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableo3-mini$1.1 input / $4.4 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableo3-mini160 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableo3-mini7.12 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinking200Ko3-mini200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinkingo3-miniResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 28.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinkingo3-miniResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 11.39%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 49.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinkingo3-miniResult
MMLUSource 86.9%Not comparable
GPQASource 77.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 74.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 8.7%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinkingo3-miniResult
AIME 2024Source 87.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinkingo3-miniResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1152Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinkingo3-miniResult
IFEvalSource 93.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and o3-mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and o3-mini today?

o3-mini: $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.