Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeekMath V2
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 #77 (Estimated); DeepSeekMath V2 #119 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeekMath V2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5; 0 to DeepSeekMath V2.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude Haiku 4.5 only
- 5
- DeepSeekMath V2 only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeekMath V2 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for DeepSeekMath V2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is priced at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeekMath V2. Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeekMath V2.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeekMath V2 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Haiku 4.5$1 input / $5 output | DeepSeekMath V2$0 input / $0 output | DeepSeekMath V2 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Haiku 4.5Not available | DeepSeekMath V2Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Haiku 4.5Not available | DeepSeekMath V2Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Haiku 4.5200K | DeepSeekMath V2128K | Claude Haiku 4.5 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeekMath V2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| JobBenchSource | 16.0% | — | Not comparable |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeekMath V2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 73.3% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeekMath V2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1152 | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeekMath V2 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeekMath V2 today?
Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens DeepSeekMath V2: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.