Skip to main content
Radar

Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.

See the free Radar Brief

Gemini 1.5 Pro

EstablishedReleased Feb 15, 2024ProprietaryNon-Reasoning1M context

Released Feb 15, 2024 see all recent releases

Decision reading
Gemini 1.5 Pro is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 0 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.

Data as of September 2, 2026 · How the score is built

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
1M
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

Published price history

This chart appears only when at least two dated first-party price records exist for the exact model. It shows rate changes, not an inferred cost trend.

07132024-052024-102025-06Output priceInput price

3 dated first-party price records. The newest record lists $5 per million tokens.

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Feb 15, 2024 · you are here

    Gemini 1.5 Pro

    Not publicly ranked · $1.25 / $5

Base entry

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

We track Gemini 1.5 Pro, but no weighted text-model benchmark result is published on the site yet. This page shows the metadata and separate protocol evidence we can verify now; a BenchLM score will appear only if compatible public evaluations land.

Gemini 1.5 Pro is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.

The profile has no source-displayable benchmark row yet.

Radar

Gemini 1.5 Pro release history

Full release history

Radar confirmed these at the source. Already tracking Gemini 1.5 Pro? See the free Radar Brief for what changes next.

Frequently asked questions

How does Gemini 1.5 Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Gemini 1.5 Pro does not have any source-displayable benchmark rows yet, so this profile does not assign a public score or rank. Documented specifications remain visible, while score-led charts and claims stay unavailable until a published evaluation can be attached to the exact model.

Does Gemini 1.5 Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Gemini 1.5 Pro currently has 6 source-displayable rows across 416 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Gemini 1.5 Pro?

Gemini 1.5 Pro has a reported context window of 1M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Compare Gemini 1.5 Pro with every tracked model409 comparisons

Last updated September 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Watch Gemini 1.5 Pro in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.