Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen2.5-1M
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 #77 (Estimated); Qwen2.5-1M #120 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen2.5-1M share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5; 0 to Qwen2.5-1M.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude Haiku 4.5 only
- 5
- Qwen2.5-1M only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen2.5-1M is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen2.5-1M yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is priced at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen2.5-1M. Qwen2.5-1M has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen2.5-1M | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Haiku 4.5$1 input / $5 output | Qwen2.5-1M$0 input / $0 output | Qwen2.5-1M has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Haiku 4.5Not available | Qwen2.5-1MNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Haiku 4.5Not available | Qwen2.5-1MNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Haiku 4.5200K | Qwen2.5-1M1M | Qwen2.5-1M lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen2.5-1M | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| JobBenchSource | 16.0% | — | Not comparable |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen2.5-1M | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 73.3% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen2.5-1M | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1152 | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen2.5-1M on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen2.5-1M today?
Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen2.5-1M: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.