Model comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Ternary Bonsai 8B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
BenchAlign evidence: Claude Haiku 4.5 estimated; Ternary Bonsai 8B not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ternary Bonsai 8B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5; 0 to Ternary Bonsai 8B.
Updated July 15, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude Haiku 4.5 only
- 5
- Ternary Bonsai 8B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ternary Bonsai 8B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Ternary Bonsai 8B yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is priced at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ternary Bonsai 8B. Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Ternary Bonsai 8B.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Ternary Bonsai 8B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Haiku 4.5$1 input / $5 output | Ternary Bonsai 8B$0 input / $0 output | Ternary Bonsai 8B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Haiku 4.5Not available | Ternary Bonsai 8BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Haiku 4.5Not available | Ternary Bonsai 8BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Haiku 4.5200K | Ternary Bonsai 8B64K | Claude Haiku 4.5 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Ternary Bonsai 8B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| JobBenchSource | 16.0% | — | Not comparable |
Coding1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Ternary Bonsai 8B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 73.3% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Ternary Bonsai 8B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1156 | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ternary Bonsai 8B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Ternary Bonsai 8B today?
Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens Ternary Bonsai 8B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.