Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.44/100
Margin
10.3pts
winning →
67.78/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking #69 (Estimated); MiMo-V2-Pro #17 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2-Pro share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking; 4 to MiMo-V2-Pro.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking only
5
MiMo-V2-Pro only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2-Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiMo-V2-Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2-Pro
CategoryClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingΔMiMo-V2-Pro
CodingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2-Pro78.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2-ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMiMo-V2-ProNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMiMo-V2-ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMiMo-V2-ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.5 Thinking200KMiMo-V2-Pro1MMiMo-V2-Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2-ProResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 89.5%95%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claw-EvalSource 57.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 36.68%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 15.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2-ProResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 20.63%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 49.5%42.5%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 78%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2-ProResult
AA-LCRSource 74.0%60.7%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
CritPtSource 4.6%0.3%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2-ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.8%40.3%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.6%87.0%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
AA-HLESource 28.4%28.3%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 13.3%4.9%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 45.7%26.8%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 59.8%29.9%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2-ProResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 91.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2-ProResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.0%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1277Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2-ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 58.0%68.8%MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2-Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.