Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs o3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

21/100
Margin
33.0pts
winning →
OpenAI
54/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and o3 share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking; 3 to o3.

Updated July 14, 2026
Shared results
14
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking only
3
o3 only
3
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and o3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and o3
CategoryClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingΔo3
MathClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapo314.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableo3$2 input / $8 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableo3118 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableo35.38 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.5 Thinking200Ko3200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Result
Tau2-TelecomSource 89.5%80.7%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 20.63%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 47.0%37.1%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-SciCodeSource 49.5%41.0%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Result
AA-LCRSource 74.0%69.3%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
CritPtSource 4.6%1.1%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.8%30.4%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.6%82.7%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-HLESource 28.4%20.0%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 13.3%-15.3%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 45.7%38.4%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 59.8%87.1%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.5%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Result
AA MATH-500Source 99.2%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 18.685%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Result
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 91.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.0%70.1%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12811071Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 Thinkingo3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 58.0%71.4%o3 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and o3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and o3 today?

o3: $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 14, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.