Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon

Updated November 13, 2026. Rank says Gemini 4 Argon is ahead. Price, access, and your workload can each overturn that. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.

Share or export
Share on XLinkedInAPI/MCP

Decision reading

Gemini 4 Argon has the higher public score, 79.03 versus 52.96, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap. 2 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Model A
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 4.5

Anthropic

52.96/100

Supported · Public rank #77

90% interval 40.0–66.0

Model B
Google logo
Gemini 4 Argon

Google

79.03/100

Supported · Public rank #8

90% interval 75.4–82.7

API price per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.5: $5 input / $25 output

Gemini 4 Argon: $2 input / $10 output

Context window

Claude Opus 4.5: 200K

Gemini 4 Argon: 1M

Released

Claude Opus 4.5: November 24, 2025

Gemini 4 Argon: September 30, 2026

Shared results
2
Claude Opus 4.5 only
63
Gemini 4 Argon only
37
Like-for-like categories
4 / 8
Supported: Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemini 4 ArgonHow the comparison works

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Gemini 4 Argon

    Gemini 4 Argon has the higher public coding point estimate, 71.8 to 43.6, with Supported evidence for both models. The conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.

    Confidence: limited

  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Gemini 4 Argon

    Gemini 4 Argon has the higher public agentic point estimate, 74.9 to 27.3, with Supported evidence for both models. The conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.

    Confidence: limited

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    Gemini 4 Argon

    Gemini 4 Argon has the larger documented context window.

    Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls

  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Gemini 4 Argon

    Gemini 4 Argon has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Gemini 4 Argon

    Gemini 4 Argon has the lower estimated token cost for this stated workload. Costs use the listed standard API rates.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. Claude Opus 4.5 does not fit this workload in one request. Claude Opus 4.5 has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.

    Confidence: rate-fallback

Which one for a specific job

Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.

The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.

43.6Claude Opus 4.571.8Gemini 4 Argon

Like-for-like · BenchAlign v5.8

Gemini 4 Argon has the higher coding point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.

Open the coding leaderboardShortlist models for this job
Same basis rules as the category table below

Or describe your own job

The LLM Selector reads what you need a model for and returns a shortlist, ranked in the same order the job pages publish.

Describe the task and constraints. This selector recommends models; it cannot carry out the task or access your files and accounts.

We keep what you type here, drafts included, for 180 days, and after that only the job and requirements read from it. Nothing is tied to your IP address or account. Leave out names and other personal details. Privacy

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

  • FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Math

    Normalized gap 73.2
    Claude Opus 4.5:4.878%
    Gemini 4 Argon:78.049%
    Shared source

  • FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Math

    Normalized gap 51.6
    Claude Opus 4.5:34.386%
    Gemini 4 Argon:85.965%
    Shared source
Bars run 0–100 on each benchmark’s normalized display scale

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, reasoning, multimodal, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Agentic

Like-for-like
Claude Opus 4.5
27.3
Supported · #109/135
Gemini 4 Argon
74.9
Supported · #6/135
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 15 vs 13 public rows
Reading
Gemini 4 Argon leads

Coding

Like-for-like
Claude Opus 4.5
43.6
Supported · #64/162
Gemini 4 Argon
71.8
Supported · #9/162
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 8 vs 9 public rows
Reading
Gemini 4 Argon leads

Reasoning

Like-for-like
Claude Opus 4.5
41.2
Supported · #76/160
Gemini 4 Argon
76.5
Supported · #7/160
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 2 vs 7 public rows
Reading
Gemini 4 Argon leads

Knowledge

Like-for-like
Claude Opus 4.5
50.1
Supported · #78/180
Gemini 4 Argon
79.2
Supported · #8/180
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 8 vs 2 public rows
Reading
Gemini 4 Argon leads

Multimodal

Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.5
49.5
Estimated · #59/67
Gemini 4 Argon
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 18 vs 5 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.5
96.5
#2/17
Gemini 4 Argon
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.5
31.9
#139/157
Gemini 4 Argon
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.5
52.9
#10/12
Gemini 4 Argon
87.4
Unranked · 2 rankable rows
Basis
Provisional lane · 4 vs 2 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, reasoning, multimodal, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Supported evidence per lane · bars run 0–100Methodology

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5
$0.0175
Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Argon
$0.007
Fits in one request

Gemini 4 Argon has the lower modeled cost

Costs use the listed standard API rates.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5
$0.325
Fits in one request
Gemini 4 Argon
$0.13
Fits in one request

Gemini 4 Argon has the lower modeled cost

Costs use the listed standard API rates.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Claude Opus 4.5
$1.35
Does not fit in one request
Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
Gemini 4 Argon
$0.16
Fits in one request

Claude Opus 4.5 does not fit this workload in one request. Claude Opus 4.5 has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.

Your workload

Enter a month of tokens to price it at both models’ listed API rates.

Claude Opus 4.5
$100.00
per month
Gemini 4 Argon
$40.00
per month

Standard listed rates, no batch or volume discounts.

Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished

Price against score, among all priced models

Overall score against output price per 1M tokens, one model per family. Pricing as of November 12, 2026.

Claude Opus 4.5Gemini 4 Argon

20406080100$0.10$0.50$1$5$10$50$100Output price, $ per 1M tokens (log)Overall score
  • 41 models score at least as high as Claude Opus 4.5 for the same price or less. The nearest is Claude Opus 5 (score 76.1, also $25.00 per 1M output tokens).
  • 2 models at the same price score higher than Gemini 4 Argon. The nearest is Gemini 4 Carbon (score 89.2, also $10.00 per 1M output tokens).

Gray dots are the other priced models. The dark step line is the efficiency frontier: for a model under it, another model costs no more and scores at least as high.

See Gemini 4 Argon on the full price vs performance chart

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Claude Opus 4.5

Not published

Gemini 4 Argon

$0.1 per 1M cached input tokens

Google Gemini API pricing

Reasoning profile

Claude Opus 4.5

Non-Reasoning

Gemini 4 Argon

Reasoning

Weight access

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

License

Claude Opus 4.5

Proprietary

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Release date

Claude Opus 4.5

2025-11-24

Gemini 4 Argon

2026-09-30

If you already use one of these models

Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
Gemini 4 Argon has the higher public score, 79.03 versus 52.96, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap.
Workload cost
Repository review: $0.325 vs $0.13. Cache-heavy agent loop: $1.35 vs $0.16.
Context tradeoff
Gemini 4 Argon has the larger documented window (1M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon has the higher public score, 79.03 versus 52.96, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap. That is the clearest overall quality signal in the current public data.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon has the higher public coding point estimate, 71.8 to 43.6, with Supported evidence for both models. The conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon has the higher public agentic tasks point estimate, 74.9 to 27.3, with Supported evidence for both models. The conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.

Which costs less, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 4 Argon?

For the stated presets, chat costs $0.0175 on Claude Opus 4.5 and $0.007 on Gemini 4 Argon; repository review costs $0.325 and $0.13; the cache-heavy agent loop costs $1.35 and $0.16. Claude Opus 4.5 does not fit this workload in one request. Claude Opus 4.5 has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate.

Which has the larger context window, Claude Opus 4.5 or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 200K.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence102 rows

Agentic

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Claude Opus 4.559.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • OSWorld-Verified

    Claude Opus 4.566.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • OSWorld

    Claude Opus 4.566.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • Claw-Eval

    Claude Opus 4.559.6%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • QwenClawBench

    Claude Opus 4.552.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • τ³-bench results

    Claude Opus 4.570.2%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • VITA-Bench

    Claude Opus 4.523.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • DeepPlanning

    Claude Opus 4.526.4%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • Toolathlon

    Claude Opus 4.543.5%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MCP Atlas

    Claude Opus 4.542.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MCP-Tasks

    Claude Opus 4.571.8%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • WideResearch

    Claude Opus 4.576.4%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • CyberGym

    Claude Opus 4.550.6%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • Gert Labs

    Claude Opus 4.564.23%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • JobBench

    Claude Opus 4.532.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • AutomationBench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon51.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Finance Agent v2

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon65.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 4.0

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon57.40%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Agents' Last Exam

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon39.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OSWorld 2.0

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon69.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CWE-bench v1

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon68.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 (6x verifier timeout)

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon57.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MazeBench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon12%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • OSWorld 2.1 Offline

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon74.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ExploitGym

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon39.5%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • RoboDojo Sim

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon34.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CWE-bench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon65.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon57.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • SWE-bench Verified

    Claude Opus 4.580.9%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • LiveCodeBench v6

    Claude Opus 4.584.8%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE-bench Pro

    Claude Opus 4.557.1%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • SWE Multilingual

    Claude Opus 4.577.5%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • NL2Repo

    Claude Opus 4.543.2%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Claude Opus 4.559.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • LiveCodeBench (Vals)

    Claude Opus 4.575.0%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • PostTrainBench v1

    Claude Opus 4.517.1%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • ScarfBench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon75.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • DeepSWE

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon77.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierSWE v2

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon55.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Vibe Code Bench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon91.90%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • PostTrainBench v1.1

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon45.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Bug Hunt Bench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon40.7 fixes
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierCode 2.0

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon26.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • CursorBench 4.0

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon52.9%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • PostTrainBench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon40.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Reasoning

  • LongBench v2

    Claude Opus 4.564.4%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • AI-Needle

    Claude Opus 4.574%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • STEMBench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon2.44
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Graphwalks BFS 128K

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon99.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • GraphWalks BFS 256K–1M

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon84.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ARC-AGI-1

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon98.50%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ARC-AGI-2

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon91.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ARC-AGI-3

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon46.3%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ARC-AGI-3 Provider Adapter

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon97.30%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • MMMU

    Claude Opus 4.580.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMMU-Pro

    Claude Opus 4.570.6%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • RealWorldQA

    Claude Opus 4.577.0%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • OmniDocBench 1.5

    Claude Opus 4.587.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • Video-MME (with subtitle)

    Claude Opus 4.577.6%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • Video-MME (w/o subtitle)

    Claude Opus 4.581.4%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MathVision

    Claude Opus 4.574.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • We-Math

    Claude Opus 4.570.0%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • DynaMath

    Claude Opus 4.579.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • SimpleVQA

    Claude Opus 4.565.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • CharXiv

    Claude Opus 4.568.5%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • CountBench

    Claude Opus 4.590.6%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • AI2D_TEST

    Claude Opus 4.587.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • ERQA

    Claude Opus 4.546.8%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • VideoMMMU

    Claude Opus 4.584.4%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MLVU (M-Avg)

    Claude Opus 4.581.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • ScreenSpot Pro

    Claude Opus 4.545.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • V*

    Claude Opus 4.567.0%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • ParseBench-2

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon84.20%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ExtractBench Pro

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon30%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Chartography (no tools)

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon71.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • LVBench

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon91.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Blueprint-Bench 2

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon54.4%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • GPQA

    Claude Opus 4.587%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • SuperGPQA

    Claude Opus 4.570.6%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Pro

    Claude Opus 4.589.5%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Redux

    Claude Opus 4.596.6%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • C-Eval

    Claude Opus 4.592.2%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • HLE

    Claude Opus 4.530.8%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA Diamond (Vals)

    Claude Opus 4.579.5%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLU-Pro (Vals)

    Claude Opus 4.585.6%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • LABBench2

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon88.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Morphology-to-molecule matching

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon25.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Multilingual

  • MMLU-ProX

    Claude Opus 4.585.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • NOVA-63

    Claude Opus 4.556.7%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • INCLUDE

    Claude Opus 4.586.2%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • PolyMath

    Claude Opus 4.579.0%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MAXIFE

    Claude Opus 4.579.2%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFEval

    Claude Opus 4.590.9%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • IFBench

    Claude Opus 4.558%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts)

    Claude Opus 4.5—
    Gemini 4 Argon0.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • AIME26

    Claude Opus 4.595.1%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • HMMT Feb 2025

    Claude Opus 4.592.9%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • HMMT Nov 2025

    Claude Opus 4.593.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • HMMT Feb 2026

    Claude Opus 4.585.3%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMAnswerBench

    Claude Opus 4.584.0%
    Source
    Gemini 4 Argon—

    Not directly comparable

  • FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Shared source
    Claude Opus 4.534.386%
    Gemini 4 Argon85.965%

    Gemini 4 Argon leads this result

  • FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)

    Shared source
    Claude Opus 4.54.878%
    Gemini 4 Argon78.049%

    Gemini 4 Argon leads this result

102 public results · 2 shared

Related comparisons

Compare API pricingRead the methodologyOpen the model selector

Watch Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

Last updated November 13, 2026