Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.5

76

VS

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct

27

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #14 · Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Claude Opus 4.5
65.9vs37.2

+28.7 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.5
66.2vs40.9

+25.3 difference

Inst. Following

Claude Opus 4.5
79.4vs75.8

+3.6 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

N/A

Speed

46 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.01s

N/A

Context Window

200K

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Claude Opus 4.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 76 to 27. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.5's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 65.9 against 37.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 87% to 40.9%.

Claude Opus 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 76 to 27. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 87% and 40.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.2 versus 40.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 65.9 versus 37.2. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for instruction following, Claude Opus 4.5 or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 79.4 versus 75.8. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.