Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Ornith-1.0-397B

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

83

VS

Ornith-1.0-397B

96

0 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #10 · Ornith-1.0-397B unranked

Pick Ornith-1.0-397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Ornith-1.0-397B
74.9vs77.5

+2.6 difference

Coding

Ornith-1.0-397B
72.9vs82.4

+9.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

Ornith-1.0-397B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Ornith-1.0-397B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 1M context window.

Ornith-1.0-397B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 96 to 83. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Ornith-1.0-397B's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 82.4 against 72.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 69.4% to 77.5%.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ornith-1.0-397B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Ornith-1.0-397B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Ornith-1.0-397B?

Ornith-1.0-397B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 96 to 83. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 69.4% and 77.5%.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Ornith-1.0-397B?

Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 82.4 versus 72.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Ornith-1.0-397B?

Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 74.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.