Skip to main content
BenchLM

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

85/100
Margin
3.0pts
winning →
88/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.8 #3; Grok 4.1 unranked

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.1 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 52 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.8; 0 to Grok 4.1.

Updated July 12, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Opus 4.8 only
52
Grok 4.1 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.1
CategoryClaude Opus 4.8ΔGrok 4.1
AgenticClaude Opus 4.880.3MarginNo overlapGrok 4.1Not measured
CodingClaude Opus 4.876.4MarginNo overlapGrok 4.1Not measured
KnowledgeClaude Opus 4.862.7MarginNo overlapGrok 4.1Not measured
MathClaude Opus 4.853.9MarginNo overlapGrok 4.1Not measured
MultimodalClaude Opus 4.877.0MarginNo overlapGrok 4.1Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.8$5 input / $25 outputGrok 4.1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.8Not availableGrok 4.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.8Not availableGrok 4.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.81MGrok 4.11MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 74.6%—Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 84.3%—Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 93.1%—Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 83.4%—Not comparable
Finance Agent v2Source 53.9%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1600—Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 82.2%—Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 59.9%—Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 72.97%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 47.2%—Not comparable
Tau2-TelecomSource 94.4%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 55.0%—Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 21.1%13.5%Claude Opus 4.8 leads
OSWorld 2.0Source 20.6%—Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 1354—Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 48.5%—Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 44.0%—Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 7.5%—Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 27.6%—Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 88.6%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 69.2%—Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 84.4%—Not comparable
SWE MultimodalSource 38.4%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 74.6%—Not comparable
cursorBench31Source 58.4%—Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 62.3%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 74.3%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 58.3%—Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 53.5%—Not comparable
FrontierCodeSource 46.5%—Not comparable
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source 84.6%—Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Result
AA-LCRSource 67.7%—Not comparable
CritPtSource 20.9%—Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Result
GPQASource 93.6%—Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 93.6%—Not comparable
HLESource 57.9%—Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 49.8%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 55.7%—Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 92.0%—Not comparable
AA-HLESource 45.7%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 27.4%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 46.6%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 35.9%—Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Result
USAMO 2026Source 96.7%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 47.241%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 31.250%—Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Result
INCLUDESource 87.6%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Result
OfficeQA ProSource 66.2%—Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 87.9%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 89.9%—Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 80.5%—Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1281—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.8Grok 4.1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 62.2%—Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Opus 4.8 and Grok 4.1 today?

Claude Opus 4.8: $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens Grok 4.1: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Anthropic Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 12, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.