Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking vs GPT-4.1 mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
44.19/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); GPT-4.1 mini #152 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GPT-4.1 mini share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking; 21 to GPT-4.1 mini.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking only
1
GPT-4.1 mini only
21
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GPT-4.1 mini is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4.1 mini has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GPT-4.1 mini
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingΔGPT-4.1 mini
CodingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 mini23.6
KnowledgeClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 mini64.2
MathClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 mini4.5
Inst. FollowingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.1 mini88.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGPT-4.1 miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-4.1 mini$0.4 input / $1.6 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-4.1 mini80 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-4.1 mini0.76 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking200KGPT-4.1 mini1MGPT-4.1 mini lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGPT-4.1 miniResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 52.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 503Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGPT-4.1 miniResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.62%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 23.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 20.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 40.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGPT-4.1 miniResult
AA-LCRSource 42.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGPT-4.1 miniResult
MMLUSource 87.5%Not comparable
GPQASource 64.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 66.4%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -50.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 82.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGPT-4.1 miniResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 4.483%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGPT-4.1 miniResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12191027Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-MMMU-ProSource 58.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingGPT-4.1 miniResult
IFEvalSource 88.5%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 38.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GPT-4.1 mini on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and GPT-4.1 mini today?

GPT-4.1 mini: $0.40 input / $1.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.