Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking vs Mistral Medium 3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
43.2/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); Mistral Medium 3 #156 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Mistral Medium 3 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking; 12 to Mistral Medium 3.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking only
1
Mistral Medium 3 only
12
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Mistral Medium 3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mistral Medium 3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingMistral Medium 3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMistral Medium 3$0.4 input / $2 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMistral Medium 357 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMistral Medium 31.20 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking200KMistral Medium 3128KClaude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingMistral Medium 3Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 24.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingMistral Medium 3Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.62%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 33.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingMistral Medium 3Result
AA-LCRSource 28.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingMistral Medium 3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 12.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 57.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -31.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 18.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 60.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingMistral Medium 3Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12191109Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-MMMU-ProSource 53.0%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingMistral Medium 3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 39.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Mistral Medium 3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Mistral Medium 3 today?

Mistral Medium 3: $0.40 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.