Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
47.2/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.5 Plus #138 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking; 3 to Qwen3.5 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking only
1
Qwen3.5 Plus only
3
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 Plus has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingΔQwen3.5 Plus
MathClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5 Plus16.3

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingQwen3.5 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableQwen3.5 Plus$0.4 input / $2.4 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableQwen3.5 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableQwen3.5 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking200KQwen3.5 Plus1MQwen3.5 Plus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingQwen3.5 PlusResult
JobBenchSource 18.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingQwen3.5 PlusResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 22.62%15.74%Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking leads
Math
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingQwen3.5 PlusResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 21.034%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingQwen3.5 PlusResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1219Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking and Qwen3.5 Plus today?

Qwen3.5 Plus: $0.40 input / $2.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.